Please check the recommendations from the IWC4 evaluations we should address
Text Field
Comment - mandatory if "no"
0
0
No
Yes
No
Radio Buttons
- • The overwhelming majority of IWC4 participants see the GEF IWC as a valuable forum for networking and sharing lessons and experiences with peers, and for intra-portfolio learning on successful innovations and key management areas.
- • Recommendations for building on the new participative learning format to improve future IWCs include: more guidance and tutoring for presenters, striking proper balance in getting broad participation and strong technical content and depth.
- Future conferences should be multilingual.
- Participant-driven workshops were felt to be extremely useful but too short
- Some questioned the need for a plenary exercise summarizing what was learned over the course of the IWC and would have preferred a shorter closing session
- It was felt to be important to describe in the orientation materials not only the format for each session but also the objectives and contribution to the overall expected outcome of the conference, thereby providing participants more of a sense of how t
- Climate adaptation should be raised to at least the same level of importance as mitigation
- Participants encouraged a session devoted just to project managers to work on management and reporting issues at future conferences.
