(Published: 10-May-2007 12:57 PM)
Governments, private sector, civil society and academia working in coordination to achieve the conservation and sustainable management of MBRS resources, securing tangible benefits for its present and future generations.
(Published: 16-Mar-2009 03:40 PM)
Annexes 1-4 from the project document for "Implementation of the Benguela Current LME Strategic Action Programme for Restoring Depleted Fisheries and Reducing Coastal Resources Degradation"
(Published: 16-Mar-2009 03:40 PM)
Project document (without annexes) for the UNDP-GEF project "Implementation of the Benguela Current LME Strategic Action Programme for Restoring Depleted Fisheries and Reducing Coastal Resources Degradation"
(Published: 16-Mar-2009 03:41 PM)
Annexes 5 from the project document for "Implementation of the Benguela Current LME Strategic Action Programme for Restoring Depleted Fisheries and Reducing Coastal Resources Degradation"
(Published: 16-Mar-2009 03:41 PM)
Annexes 6-8 from the project document for "Implementation of the Benguela Current LME Strategic Action Programme for Restoring Depleted Fisheries and Reducing Coastal Resources Degradation"
(Published: 16-Mar-2009 03:40 PM)
CEO Endorsement Form for the project "Implementation of the Benguela Current LME Strategic Action Program for Restoring Depleted Fisheries and Reducing Coastal Resources Degradation"
(Published: 11-Apr-2005 02:30 PM)
El objetivo principal del proyecto fue la preparación del Programa Estratégico de Acción (PEA),
como instrumento para promover, por intermedio de las instituciones responsables, el desarrollo
sostenible de la cuenca binacional e interjurisdiccional del río Bermejo mediante la incorporación de
las preocupaciones ambientales en las políticas, planes y programas de desarrollo en la cuenca, la instauración
de una visión de cuenca y de manejo integrado de los recursos naturales.
Este documento describe el conjunto de acciones prioritarias que ambos países han coincidido en
identificar como necesarias para atender los principales problemas ambientales y sus manifestaciones
transfronterizas, reflejando los resultados del proceso de participación y consulta desarrollado. También
establece el marco institucional y de compromisos diseñado para llevarlas adelante y determina las
necesidades de financiamiento para los proyectos y elementos que fueron seleccionados y desarrollados.
De esta forma se posibilita el ingreso a la próxima Fase de Implementación del Programa.
(Published: 26-Aug-2009 07:08 AM)
Desiring to rehabilitate and protect the Black Sea the Governments of: Bulgaria Georgia Romania the Russian Federation Turkey, and Ukraine Reaffirming their commitment to the rehabilitation and protection of the Black Sea ecosystem and the sustainable development of its resources
(Published: 11-Apr-2005 02:30 PM)
Desiring to rehabilitate and protect the Black Sea the Governments of:
Bulgaria
Georgia
Romania
the Russian Federation
Turkey, and
Ukraine
Reaffirming their commitment to the rehabilitation and protection of the Black Sea
ecosystem and the sustainable development of its resources ...(p. 2)
(Published: 11-Apr-2005 02:30 PM)
The SAP lays down the principles of environmental management and cooperation; notes the challenges to the
sustainable integrated management of the Caspian Sea environment; sets the regionally agreed Environmental Quality Objectives (EQOs) for the four areas of environmental concern in a transboundary context and proceeds to define a set of targets and interventions to meet these objectives. The SAP also highlights the financial resource and the institutional structure required for the implementation of the priority actions for the next 5+5 years. (p. 4).
(Published: 11-Apr-2005 02:30 PM)
The SAP lays down the principles of environmental management and cooperation; notes the challenges to the
sustainable integrated management of the Caspian Sea environment; sets the regionally agreed Environmental Quality Objectives (EQOs) for the four areas of environmental concern in a transboundary context and proceeds to define a set of targets and interventions to meet these objectives. The SAP also highlights the financial resource and the institutional structure required for the implementation of the priority actions for the next 5+5 years. (p. 4).
(Published: 11-Apr-2005 02:30 PM)
(Published: 11-Apr-2005 02:30 PM)
This document draws upon a number of reports that have been produced in the Caspian region under the umbrella of the Caspian Environment Programme. These include the Caspian Regional Thematic Centre (CRTC) Regional Reports, the Caspian Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis, the National Caspian Action Plans (NCAPs) for the 5 littoral states and various other reports detailing aspects of the Caspian biological, economic and legal status. Chapters 1, 2 and 3 of this report include broad summaries of these previous documents and do not attempt to restate the detail other than to draw out the points relevant to development of a Caspian BSAP. Chapter 1 includes general information on the value of conserving biodiversity and places the work to develop a Caspian BSAP in the broader context of the international as well as the national obligations of the 5 littoral states. Chapter 3 outlines some of the main regional impacts on the biodiversity of the Caspian that have been identified through previous work and through the consultation process that was central to the development of this BSAP. Chapter 4 details the aims that were agreed for the BSAP and includes the action plan that has been developed with the regional stakeholders. Finally, Chapters 5 and 6 examine some of the options for implementation of the BSAP in the context of existing structures and mechanisms that have been proven to work elsewhere. (p. 7)
(Published: 11-Apr-2005 02:30 PM)
This document draws upon a number of reports that have been produced in the Caspian region under the umbrella of the Caspian Environment Programme. These include the Caspian Regional Thematic Centre (CRTC) Regional Reports, the Caspian Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis, the National Caspian Action Plans (NCAPs) for the 5 littoral states and various other reports detailing aspects of the Caspian biological, economic and legal status. Chapters 1, 2 and 3 of this report include broad summaries of these previous documents and do not attempt to restate the detail other than to draw out the points relevant to development of a Caspian BSAP. Chapter 1 includes general information on the value of conserving biodiversity and places the work to develop a Caspian BSAP in the broader context of the international as well as the national obligations of the 5 littoral states. Chapter 3 outlines some of the main regional impacts on the biodiversity of the Caspian that have been identified through previous work and through the consultation process that was central to the development of this BSAP. Chapter 4 details the aims that were agreed for the BSAP and includes the action plan that has been developed with the regional stakeholders. Finally, Chapters 5 and 6 examine some of the options for implementation of the BSAP in the context of existing structures and mechanisms that have been proven to work elsewhere. (p. 7)
(Published: 11-Apr-2005 02:30 PM)
The present Report of the SAP has been prepared on the basis of existing analytical documents, in
particular the National Review Reports and the results of the National Planning Workshops. A
genuine bottom-top approach has associated in the elaboration of this SAP about 300 professionals
and experts from all Danube countries, from central and local Governments, from Non
Governmental Organizations (NGOs), from universities and research institutions and from the
private sector. (p. 5)
Action Plan for the Protection and Sustainable Development of the Mesoamerican Barrier Reef System, 2006 (100kb)
Caspian Sea Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (Final Draft). 2002. (792 KB)
